Taking it to the street!

 A response to this:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6329595&postID=8694076780561047436

<I>The substantive problem is the idea itself, that it is preferable to fight in court. The pro-abortion side has experienced a devastating loss in court — though perhaps the appearance of loss is a phantom. Maybe the Court will reject the draft. But the fighting in court over this case is over, and the street protests might still affect the Justices. All you need is one person in the draft majority to shift</I>


1: Roe was an invention of the Courts.  Your "devastating loss in court" is that your illegitimate victory has been cancelled

2: If "street protests affect the Justices", and cause one to go away from the obviously correct decision, you will not like the result.


Kylie Rittenhouse was all alone, mobbed by multiple left wing attackers.  He killed two, injured one, and the rest ran away so he could go on his way (whereupon he tried to turn himself in to the cops)


If you want things decided by street fighting instead of politics, we are willing to meet you there.

But you'll lose far worse there, than you will in the political / judicial arena

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stealing the 2020 Presidential election

Why Cuomo belongs in jail

CDC justification for new masking rules is total trash