Excusing the Leak

https://draft.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6329595&postID=6714197015890663710

<I>"Leaks can serve a really important role in helping to correct government malfeasance</I>


5 SCOTUS justices voting in a way you don't like is not "government malfeasance"


<I>to encourage government to be careful about what it does in secret</I>

The end result of this is a public release, the diametric opposite of "what [the government] does in secret"


<I> to preserve democratic processes</I>."

Roe and Casey were assaults on the democratic process, whereas this is a restoration of them


So none of these apply to the leak


<I>“ This was a document whose final version was intended to be public within a couple months. This isn’t revealing any type of internal secret or misbehavior.”


Do you think the leaker agrees? I would guess that the leaker thinks either: 1. The destruction of a treasured right is misbehavior, or 2. Throwing away the prime opportunity to save millions of lives is misbehavior.</I>


1: Abortion is the taking of a human life.  So your #2 would only be valid by someone who supports the document being release

2: SCOTUS doesn't create "treasured rights".  All the Roe defenders are talking about "a right that's existed for 50 years", which means they all admit that Roe was an exercise of raw judicial power, NOT a legitimate decision based on the Constitution, law, and history


"My body, my choice" was junked by the Left last year, with all their "Covid vaccine mandates".  So all you're left with is a "treasured right" to kill your baby after you screwed around without protection or planning.


Which is not an actual right


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/what-alito-got-right/ar-AAWVqhr?ocid=BingNewsSearch


<I>First, it’s important to understand the question before the Supreme Court. It is not “Should American women possess a right to abortion?” but “Does the American Constitution protect abortion rights?” The distinction is of paramount importance. The Court’s job is not to determine which rights we should possess but rather the rights we do possess.</I>


As we all seem to agree that abortion is NOT a right granted by the US Constitution, but one invented by members of SCOTUS in 1973, we all agree that Alito's position is the correct one.


No?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stealing the 2020 Presidential election

 1: No honest vote counter blocks poll watchers from doing their job. 2: It is a generally accepted rule in international elections monitoring that "blocked poll watchers" == "fraudulent election outcome."  See: Uganda, Jan 2021. 3: I know that Detroit, Philly, Atlanta, are are on clear public record as having blocked Trump campaign poll watchers.  Those right there are enough to flip the election 4: Therefore any claim that "of course the election was honest and fair, and anyone who claims otherwise is a nut" is a statement utterly lacking in principle or value, and to make that claim is to self identify as a nut. 5: http://wkow.com/2020/11/13/concerns-over-indefinitely-confined-voting-law-as-thousands-use-the-option-due-to-covid-19/ In 2016 there were ~60k "indefinitely confined" absentee voters in WI (IC voters can vote absentee without providing State issued photo ID.  All others have to provide it, and thus prove they're actual real peop
Read more

Why Cuomo belongs in jail

 I posted this over here , in response to the post  and this argument: If Cuomo broke positive law by retaliating against women who had lodged complaints about his behavior, then those retaliation-related allegations (if true) could supply a good basis for impeachment. The COVID19 allegations are entirely different. If Cuomo chose poorly (as we now understand it) in sending elderly patients with COVID19 into nursing homes, but did so acting on the information before him and for disinterested ends (i.e., in the narrow sense of not taking any bribes), then that is a reason for voters (if they so choose) to boot him out of office, but not for the legislature to impeach. Otherwise, you are converting impeachment into an ongoing legislative vote of no confidence. As my comment still hasn't escaped moderation, I'm posting it here: "If Cuomo chose poorly (as we now understand it) in sending elderly patients with COVID19 into nursing homes, but did so acting on the information bef
Read more

CDC justification for new masking rules is total trash

 Thank you Instapundit The CDC's study says In July 2021, following multiple large public events in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, town, 469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents who had traveled to the town during July 3–17; 346 (74%) occurred in fully vaccinated persons. Testing identified the Delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients. Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not. So, let's lay some groundwork (thank you Twitchy ): Town population less than 3,000 County population about 220,000 40,000 people show up for "Bear Week", a week of gay celebration for people, many of who just spent the week before "Pride partying" in NYC One of the more popular bars "resembles a kind of dank dungeon where sweat drips from the ceiling and mold reaches up the walls" A large number of the people there are going for the sex.  Note: gay men having se
Read more