Only one Party

https://davidblaska.com/2021/11/28/if-republicans-are-tearing-country-apart/comment-page-1/?unapproved=70591&moderation-hash=f92e281d22e8aea656e588d17db52188#comment-70591


 “Only one party turns a vigilante who killed two people … into a folk hero,” Dave indicts

The only vigilantes there were the three leftists who attacked Kyle after he shot the child rapist who was trying to murder him.

That was the prosecutor’s justification for why it was legitimate for them to attack Kyle, and why Kyle’s self defense against him wasn’t legitimate: because they were “attacking an active shooter”.

1: 2 minutes of running to turn yourself into the copse nd not shooting anyone, is the exact opposite of an “active shooter”
2: What they were doing was trying to kill Kyle for his “crime” of shooting one of their own thugs.
Which makes them the platonic ideal of “vigilantes”

Mr. Zweifel continues his trope: “Only one party … wants to limit access to the ballot.”
Yes, one Party wants to “limit access to the ballot” to only legal voters, each one only once. The horror!
The other Party wants to destroy any value to voting, by flooding every ballot box with so many illegal votes that no one’s vote actually matters

Zweifel: “Only one party rises in defense of parents publicly threatening school boards.” 
Only one Party defines “being upset that the school board is covering up the rape of your daughter” as “publicly threatening school boards”.
And the democrats are most certainly in favor of threatening school boards. That was one of the points of the BLM riots in 2020: threatening any part of the government that opposed their agenda with violence and destruction

Zweifel: “Only one party has taken to defending book-banning …”
Like Tom Sawyer, Huck Finn, and To Kill a Mockingbird. That Party is the Democrats

Zweifel: “Only one party refuses to debate voting reform.”
That would be the Democrats, who demand getting their way without any debate allowed.

Zweifel: “Only one party … relies on conspiracy theories.”
Yes, teh democrats, with their Russian Collusion BS

Zweifel: “Only one party believes elections are a fraud unless the Republican wins.”
Nope. We believe elections are fraud when the vote counters exclude poll watchers, and set them where they can’t actually monitor what’s happening. Because the only reason to do that is that you’re violating the law to steal the election.

We believe elections are fraud when the vote counters stop counting election night with thousands of ballots left to count. Because the only reason to do that is you’ve realized you don’t have enough fake ballots to steal the election, and need to make more up before continuing.

We believe elections are fraud when the vote counters “discover” boxes of votes that happen to have a strong Democrat imbalance, just when the vote is looking like it might go to the Republican

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stealing the 2020 Presidential election

 1: No honest vote counter blocks poll watchers from doing their job. 2: It is a generally accepted rule in international elections monitoring that "blocked poll watchers" == "fraudulent election outcome."  See: Uganda, Jan 2021. 3: I know that Detroit, Philly, Atlanta, are are on clear public record as having blocked Trump campaign poll watchers.  Those right there are enough to flip the election 4: Therefore any claim that "of course the election was honest and fair, and anyone who claims otherwise is a nut" is a statement utterly lacking in principle or value, and to make that claim is to self identify as a nut. 5: http://wkow.com/2020/11/13/concerns-over-indefinitely-confined-voting-law-as-thousands-use-the-option-due-to-covid-19/ In 2016 there were ~60k "indefinitely confined" absentee voters in WI (IC voters can vote absentee without providing State issued photo ID.  All others have to provide it, and thus prove they're actual real peop
Read more

Why Cuomo belongs in jail

 I posted this over here , in response to the post  and this argument: If Cuomo broke positive law by retaliating against women who had lodged complaints about his behavior, then those retaliation-related allegations (if true) could supply a good basis for impeachment. The COVID19 allegations are entirely different. If Cuomo chose poorly (as we now understand it) in sending elderly patients with COVID19 into nursing homes, but did so acting on the information before him and for disinterested ends (i.e., in the narrow sense of not taking any bribes), then that is a reason for voters (if they so choose) to boot him out of office, but not for the legislature to impeach. Otherwise, you are converting impeachment into an ongoing legislative vote of no confidence. As my comment still hasn't escaped moderation, I'm posting it here: "If Cuomo chose poorly (as we now understand it) in sending elderly patients with COVID19 into nursing homes, but did so acting on the information bef
Read more

CDC justification for new masking rules is total trash

 Thank you Instapundit The CDC's study says In July 2021, following multiple large public events in a Barnstable County, Massachusetts, town, 469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents who had traveled to the town during July 3–17; 346 (74%) occurred in fully vaccinated persons. Testing identified the Delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients. Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not. So, let's lay some groundwork (thank you Twitchy ): Town population less than 3,000 County population about 220,000 40,000 people show up for "Bear Week", a week of gay celebration for people, many of who just spent the week before "Pride partying" in NYC One of the more popular bars "resembles a kind of dank dungeon where sweat drips from the ceiling and mold reaches up the walls" A large number of the people there are going for the sex.  Note: gay men having se
Read more