Tweets and letters to the editor

    Stephen Lathrop says:

"All the major internet, “platforms,” are in fact publishers"


Correct


"Unless the laws of publishing are alike for all publishers—and do not excessively burden the constitutional liberties of some publishers—there is a First Amendment problem which cannot be wished away."


Correct.


Section 230 protects the "internet platform" publishers, like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, from libel law.  All other publishers are subject to libel law.


This is clearly a violation the First Amendment, and therefore must be ended.


I'm so glad we're in agreement.


Tweets on Twitter are functionally equivalent to letters to the editor to a paper.  And you can most certainly be sued and lose for publishing those.


If that means that Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube go out of business, so what?  Napster went out of business when copyright law was properly enforced against them.


Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have chosen a business model that depends on an illegitimate government subsidy: immunity from libel law. If removing the illegitimate subsidy drives them out of business, that's their problem, not ours

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stealing the 2020 Presidential election

Why Cuomo belongs in jail

CDC justification for new masking rules is total trash